<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p style='margin:0in'>< <span style='color:black'>Instead of asking, "Did this person act out of free will?", we should probably better ask \u200b"Given their biological state, stress level, history, psychological conditioning, and available information, how many meaningful alternative paths could this system actually evaluate and take in that moment?"</span> ><o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p style='margin:0in'><span style='color:black'><br></span>The coarse graining is so crude that it would appear they have many. Just as it would appear there is a probability distribution observed with a quantum measurement because the measurer\u2019s state needs to be known too, and it is impossible to capture that like one might come closed to capturing a closed and isolated quantum system.<span style='color:#333333'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p style='margin:0in'><o:p> </o:p></p><p style='margin:0in'>Marcus<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></body></html>