<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body dir="auto"><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Google Sans"; white-space: pre-wrap;">For the new book I have read the famous philsophers like Dennett, Searle, and Nagel, and u</span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Google Sans"; white-space: pre-wrap;">sed AIs to summarize their books. Nagel's book "The view frok nowhere" is a bit simplistic. Reality is more complex than having just two views, subjective and objective, isn't it? </span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Google Sans"; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Google Sans"; white-space: pre-wrap;">In the desperate cries of babies we see pure desires and raw emotions. Babies are cute but naturally egocentric. Lacking language they only can perceive the world in a subjective view, and helpless as they are they need to communicate their needs to their parents.</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Google Sans"; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">The only view they have is a 1st person view (characterized by "one great blooming, buzzing confusion" as William James said, </span><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">which</span><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> they interrupt by intense bursts of emotions). Everything a toddler perceives is extremely subjective. In a sense a toddler knows nothing else.</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Grown-ups have learnt to follow social rules and norms. They learned the value of politeness and friendliness. They are able to reach a more objective view of the world. Thomas Nagel called this view the "view from nowhere" in his book of the same name.</span></p><br dir="auto"><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">As we grow older we move along the spectrum from high selfishness to low selfishness. We are still driven by emotions and do not become fully objective, but we acquire the ability to view the world from an objective view. Nagel calls this</span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Google Sans"; white-space: pre-wrap;"> ability to move from a subjective to an objective view detachment. We see it normal child development:</span></p><br dir="auto"><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Babies -> Toddlers -> Children -> Teenagers -> Grownups</span></p><br dir="auto"><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">There are exceptions: evil psychopaths and vile narcissts are still as selfish as toddlers or use emotions to manipulate other people. Artists, musicians, poets and critics are intentionally using personal feelings and emotions to be creative in their works.</span></p><br dir="auto"><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Narcissists/pyschopaths (subjectivity for bad purpose) <-> Creative persons (subjectivity for good purpose) </span></p><br dir="auto"><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Would you agree that seeing subjectivity as a spectrum is more useful that postulating only two views (subjective vs. objective) ? ChatGPT has created the attached image for it.</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Google Sans"; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Google Sans"; white-space: pre-wrap;">-J.</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><br></p><br dir="auto"><br dir="auto"></body></html>