[FRIAM] How we can make the COUNTRY great again

[Gary Schiltz]

I don't have much experience with the GEO providers, e.g. Hughes, but I
seem to remember that the minimum latency of about a quarter second round
trip imposed by the speed of light makes them very unpleasant to use for
VOIP, otherwise they are okay. Still, fiber is so much cheaper up until the
"last mile" (in urban areas), which more or less equates with the "last ten
miles" in rural areas. I have the impression that a lot of highways have
fiber optic along them, as the easements are already in place and they
connect urban areas capable of using the bandwidth from the fiber. But many
rural roads extend for many miles or tens of miles, with a few houses
widely scattered along them, so the cost of fiber is harder to justify
there. On flat land, microwave works very well with little investment in
towers, but the hillier the land is, the more towers and repeaters are
necessary. So something like Facebook's drone idea seems quite attractive:
use the drones as if they were extremely high towers, capable of relaying
signal from fiber optic connections along the highways down to those widely
scattered rural houses. One of the problems is keeping the antennas
aligned, since the airfoil-design drones need to keep moving to stay in the
air. I wonder if they have looked at using helium balloons for the lift,
and only use drone technology to stabilize them. That should work if the
wind is minimal at extremely high altitudes.

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com>
wrote:

> Perhaps a hybrid GEO/LEO could be made?   The bandwidths are not bad for
> the existing satellite internet solutions.
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam [mailto:friam-bounces at redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Gary
> Schiltz
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 28, 2017 11:55 AM
>
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam at redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] How we can make the COUNTRY great again
>
>
>
> That's cool, but this type of low earth orbit (LEO) satellites seem to me
> more sutible for ubiquitous low bandwidth communication, e.g. satellite
> phones. I don't know how well it would scale - for example, I doubt that
> millions of people could simultaneously get their full megabit from a small
> LEO constellation. One alternative that looks intriguing to me is
> Facebook's Aquila drone, that flies at about 20km altitude - still low
> enough for microwave broadband communication, but high enough to avoid
> commercial air traffic.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com>
> wrote:
>
> Space X just launched the first 10 (of 70) of Iridium NEXT low-earth
> satellites.
>
>
>
> https://www.iridium.com/company/industryleadership/iridiumcertus
>
>
>
> It’s not high bandwidth (about a 1MB/sec), but should be lower latency
> than HughesNet, Wildblue, etc.
>
>
>
> *From: *Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> on behalf of Nick Thompson <
> nickthompson at earthlink.net>
> *Reply-To: *The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam at redfish.com>
> *Date: *Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 11:13 AM
> *To: *'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <
> friam at redfish.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [FRIAM] How we can make the COUNTRY great again
>
>
>
> No BroadBand at my farm in Central Massachusetts.  Awaiting Gary’s
> International Assistance.  Remember a few years back when Venezuela was
> supplying cut-rate oil to low income people in New England?
>
>
>
> Just Sayin’
>
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> Nicholas S. Thompson
>
> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
>
> Clark University
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam [mailto:friam-bounces at redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Gary
> Schiltz
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 28, 2017 10:43 AM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam at redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] How we can make the COUNTRY great again
>
>
>
> I have been working here in Ecuador to provide internet access to poorly
> served areas, and it is a challenge, albiet not an insurmountable one.
> Wireless technology from smallish companies like Ubiquiti, Mikrotik, and
> Mimosa to name a few, is pretty inexpensive, even here where import duties
> are high. The big challenge where I'm working is getting line-of-sight
> between nodes, where there is a lot of dense forest cover over 20 meters
> high.
>
>
>
> One thing that I found interesting in the article that Jochen linked to is
> that the US FCC defines broadband as 25mbps down / 3mbps up. Maybe I'm just
> used to it, but I find about 2up/1down plenty even for video streaming.
> More is always better, of course :-)
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Owen Densmore <owen at backspaces.net>
> wrote:
>
> Santa Fe, and New Mexico in general, is interesting in that regard.
>
> [...]
>
> But then there is a lot of the countryside that is left out of this. I
> really like the idea of making the Country(side) important. In NM there
> issues with the tribal lands which are poorly served, but it's getting
> better.
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20170128/2dcd7815/attachment-0002.html>