[FRIAM] AI and argument

[gⅼеɳ ☣]

Hm.  My example is simply an argument that I do NOT think succumbs to that fallacy.  Einstein is a reliable, but not completely unchallengeable, authority.  And if he is challenged, we can dig into the theory to find our own reasoning.

I'm curious if you believe all argument/reasoning can be *accurately* formalized?  Worse yet, do you believe that all argument can be reduced to deduction?


On 10/03/2017 05:13 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
> Aren't you missing a premise, if you are seeking a valid deductive argument?
> 
> What connects Albert's thought with your conclusion?

-- 
☣ gⅼеɳ