[FRIAM] Truth: “Hunh! What is it good for? Absolutely Nothing!”
Prof David West
profwest at fastmail.fm
Thu Oct 19 14:34:32 EDT 2017
Frank, nothing is wrong with mentioning brains, except the number of
potential diversions the use of such vocabulary introduces, increasing
the scattering of conversational threads. my only hope was to establish
a kind of specific definition for truth, as requested by Nick.
Nick's definition was operational and involved a system of interacting
individuals and the possibility of (non)convergence while mine is at a
more fundamental level as a condition of a single system. Nick's
definition arises at the level of a group, while mine is restricted to
the condition of a single entity.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, at 06:50 AM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
> Something you say reminds me of the difference between grey matter and
> white matter in the brain. What's wrong with mentioning brains?
> White matter influence increases with age as I recall.>
> Frank
>
> Frank Wimberly
> Phone (505) 670-9918
>
> On Oct 19, 2017 1:07 AM, "Prof David West"
> <profwest at fastmail.fm> wrote:>> Nick,
>>
>> Yeah, the model is pretty obtuse - because I was trying to
>> avoid using>> terminology like mind, brain, etc. But it was probably a futile
>> effort.>>
>> I define lower-case truth as a particular state of a mechanism, an
>> impaired state. So my sensor-connection web - effector mechanism was>> designed/evolved to be absolutely dynamic and flexible so that
>> it can>> respond to any possible combination of inputs by activating any
>> and all>> appropriate outputs. If a sensor or an effector fails, the
>> abilities of>> the system are diminished. If a specific pathway through the web of>> pathways becomes fixed and inflexible, the abilities of the
>> system are>> diminished.
>>
>> I define lower-case truth as nothing more than one of those
>> capability>> diminishing 'failures' of the system.
>>
>> Because the failure is within the system, it is local - hence 'local>> truth'.
>>
>> This is not a "belief" in the usual sense of that word, because
>> the word>> implies a "believer," and I speak of nothing except a mechanism and>> particular states of that mechanism.
>>
>> Upper-case Truth simply does not exist.
>>
>> Now,application of my model, use of my definition of 'truth', to
>> understand the individual mechanism and its behavior in a large
>> context>> I need to take small steps. So let me say that my mechanism is what>> underlies a human individual and look at one aspect of that
>> individual's>> behavior - the use of language.
>>
>> A language like English is extraordinarily fluid and dynamic. That
>> fluidity and dynamism is diminished, significantly, when individuals>> increasingly rely on linguistic constructs of the form: A IS B.
>> You have>> heard me say, many times that the verb 'to be' is the root of all
>> linguistic evil. I made that exact point in my model when
>> asserting that>> a channelized circuit equated to A (a set of inputs) = B (a set of
>> outputs).
>>
>> At some point, the application of my model/definition to a system
>> containing multiple individual systems would be in order, but I
>> have not>> approached that topic as yet. Primarily because my intent so far has>> just to provide the definition of 'truth' that you said was
>> missing from>> the discussion.
>>
>> davew
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017, at 01:28 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
>> > David,
>> >
>> > Just checking: I have a hard time following the model in detail,
>> > but it>> > sounds like what you mean by "truth" is very like what I mean by
>> > "belief". For me, a belief is a "local truth".
>> >
>> > So, that being the case, what is the name of the thing that
>> > you say>> > doesn't exist, the thing that other people call, T-with-a-capital
>> > Truth>> > Are you asserting that there is no stable purchase point beyond
>> > what I>> > would call, "individual belief". When a group of people coalesces
>> > around>> > a belief, what would you call that? (Shared belief?) Are all
>> > shared>> > beliefs of the same quality? (Group think?)
>> >
>> > Now please remember -- nobody seems to understand this point --
>> > that as>> > of the moment I have made no argument for the EXISTENCE of
>> > anything>> > beyond local truth.
>> >
>> > Nicholas S. Thompson
>> > Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
>> > Clark University
>> > http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Friam [mailto:friam-bounces at redfish.com] On Behalf Of Prof
>> > David>> > West
>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 12:59 PM
>> > To: friam at redfish.com
>> > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Truth: “Hunh! What is it good for? Absolutely>> > Nothing!”
>> >
>> > Steve,
>> >
>> > My definition refers to a single system - a single system and
>> > is not>> > intended to suggest anything about interacting systems, nor
>> > anything>> > external to itself. I do assume that this system is contained
>> > within a>> > complex system which is the source of the input signals detected
>> > by the>> > sensors. I similarly assume that the effectors may transmit
>> > signals to>> > the containing system but want to leave that aside for the moment.>> >
>> > I could metaphorically equate my system to a neural network brain
>> > within>> > the skin of a human being — but again would prefer to simply focus
>> > on my>> > system in a non-anthropomorphized manner; just to keep things
>> > simple and>> > to avoid the potential for diversions into side conversations.
>> >
>> > I am also using neural networks - without naming things as such -
>> > again,>> > to avoid distractions, this makes explanations clumsier, but it
>> > serves my>> > purpose for the moment.
>> >
>> > The connecting web can route any input to any output, using a near>> > infinite number of pathways. More importantly it can route any
>> > combination of inputs to any combination of outputs along any of
>> > the near>> > INFINITE (I yell only to point out the combinatorial explosion of>> > pathways) number of routes (circuits).
>> >
>> > Now imagine that this system is an organism and that the
>> > connection of>> > some [input | set of inputs | pattern of inputs] to [an| set of |
>> > pattern>> > of] outputs increases its survival potential. Further imagine that
>> > this>> > system is highly dynamic and acutely optimized to assure than and
>> > and all>> > input/s are conveyed to the most useful output/s (with useful
>> > being>> > simply the increase or maintenance of survival potential.
>> > The web of input-output connects can be 'rewired' in "real time,"
>> > i.e.>> > in whatever unit of time exists between receipt of the next
>> > inputs.>> >
>> > Now imagine that a/some sensors seem to receive the same input
>> > over and>> > over again and, due to "fatigue" they either shut down and fail to
>> > relay>> > the input to the web, or they lock into constantly sending the
>> > same input>> > value to the web without regard to whatever was actually sensed.
>> > System fault.
>> >
>> > Similarly, a particular pathway (set of pathways) are utilized
>> > more often>> > when receiving a particular pattern of inputs and those pathways
>> > channelize, essentially become fixed. System fault because the
>> > ability of>> > the system to adapt is impaired. This would be particularly
>> > evident if>> > the pattern of inputs begins to subtly change, but change enough
>> > that the>> > pattern of outputs should be modified and they are not.
>> >
>> > Whenever these faults occur, the system as a whole starts behaving
>> > as if>> > A (set of inputs) IS B (set of outputs). That simply use of the
>> > verb 'to>> > be' is my definition of "truth," and it is purely local because
>> > it is a>> > condition/state of the individual system.
>> >
>> > Very quickly - imagine several such systems interacting. Your
>> > marching>> > band for example. For each member of the band as a single
>> > organism (of>> > the type discussed above) all the other members of the band are
>> > simply>> > part of a containing complex system. When each of the individual
>> > systems>> > are using their innate ability to route the 'right' inputs to the
>> > 'right'>> > outputs the outcome can be cacophony that morphs into an exquisite>> > performance. But when individual systems start to fail - establish>> > truthiness - start to "mail in" their part of the overall
>> > performance,>> > the band as a whole and your enjoyment of their performance is
>> > bound to>> > suffer.
>> >
>> > davew
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017, at 04:58 PM, Steven A Smith wrote:
>> > > Dave sez:
>> > > > It is certainly possible for one sensor-web-effector state
>> > > > machine>> > > > to "infect" another, i.e. stimulate a second machine to
>> > > > replicate>> > > > the behavior. If that happens we have 'convergence' which is
>> > > > nothing>> > > > more than collective 'fault'/ 'defectiveness'.
>> > > >
>> > > It sounds as if you believe that resonance, mode locking, phase>> > > locking, tidal locking, etc. are somehow defective ways for
>> > > systems>> > > to interact. I can agree that they are modestly less
>> > > interesting>> > > than more chaotic systems. While *I* might find a marching
>> > > (esp. if>> > > they are goose-stepping) army aberrant (and abhorrent), I might
>> > > find a>> > > *marching band* or *synchronized swimmers* or a dance-troupe
>> > > following>> > > a choreography (e.g. Cirque de Soliel perfomance) somehow
>> > > beautiful.>> > > And I would suggest these are examples of what you are judging
>> > > as>> > > "defective"? I suppose that since only a *subsystem* of the
>> > > units>> > > (dancers/musicians/soldiers) are mode/phase-locked for the
>> > > duration of>> > > the march/performance, that this is only a partial example and
>> > > therefore only *partially* defective/faulty?
>> > >
>> > > I believe it is in the liminal space which fills the near-
>> > > locality of>> > > a shared "dialect" where the interesting stuff happens, not
>> > > unlike in>> > > dynamical systems' "edge of chaos". I agree with the technical>> > > expression that any "statement of Truth" is a defect, but that
>> > > does>> > > not mean that it doesn't gesture in the direction of, or roughly>> > > circumscribe, or provide a proxy for a more transcendent
>> > > "truth".>> > > One
>> > > *might* argue that each individual has a private, idiosyncratic>> > > dialect of "the same language", and that interaction amongst
>> > > individuals whose dialects are similar enough to intend to
>> > > agree/discuss/converge/??>> > >
>> > > I would claim that a well formed question suggests a family of
>> > > "answers">> > > and thereby hints at what we want to believe in as "truth".
>> > >
>> > > This paper may (or may not) offer some perspective on the
>> > > evolution of>> > > a language/dialect and teh convergence/coherence issue.
>> > >
>> > > https://www.researchgate.net/project/Coherence-Convergence-and-Change->> > > A-Sociolinguistic-Variationist-Approach-to-Dialect-and-Standard-
>> > > Langua>> > > ge-Use-in-Swabia
>> > >
>> > > - Steve
>> > >
>> > > ============================================================
>> > > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30
>> > > at cafe>> > > at St. John's College to unsubscribe
>> > > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> > > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove>> >
>> > ============================================================
>> > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to
>> > unsubscribe>> > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
>> >
>> >
>> > ============================================================
>> > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> > to unsubscribe
>> > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com>> > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20171019/e02d5c3f/attachment.html>
More information about the Friam
mailing list