[FRIAM] Doxastic logic - Wikipedia

[gⅼеɳ ☣]

If you, as a non-dualist, allow for tentative action, why not allow for tentative belief?

On 09/21/2017 02:20 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
> Peirce defined belief as that upon which we act and doubt as the absence of belief.  It follows logically that anything we act on affirms some belief and, therefore, at the moment of action, extinguishes all contrary beliefs.  If you follow me here, I may appear to win the argument, but only on sophistic points.  

-- 
☣ gⅼеɳ