[FRIAM] The fundamental theory of physics

[Jochen Fromm]

I don't know, possibly. What Stephen and his team seem to be doing is to take some form of graph or hypergraph, and then they apply transformations to it in an iterative loop. The result gets more and more complex.We know that some IFSs and L-Systems produce beautiful results through repeated iterations, but beauty alone is not a guarantee for a good theory. It looks interesting, but I am not sure if it really is the path to a fundamental theory :-/-J.
-------- Original message --------From: Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com> Date: 4/15/20  20:39  (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The fundamental theory of physics 

Wasn’t John Baez doing this stuff in the late 90s?
 

From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> on behalf of Jochen Fromm <jofr at cas-group.net>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 11:37 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: [FRIAM] The fundamental theory of physics


 


What do you think of Stephen Wolfram's latest findings? It is always interesting to see what he is doing IMHO


https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2020/04/finally-we-may-have-a-path-to-the-fundamental-theory-of-physics-and-its-beautiful/


 


-J.


 



 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20200415/805a50d9/attachment.html>