[FRIAM] OK. That's funny.

[jon zingale]

Thought of another way, I can interpret Peirce-truthiness in terms of
alethic operators. Let's say that an apt-belief is Peirce-true if it
belongs to the collection of everyone's potential apt-beliefs, in other
words, they will be found to be necessarily apt-believable (□). This
leaves the collection of apt-beliefs that at least one other person
will never find believable, those that are possibly apt-believable (◇),
and doomed to never be Peirce-true.



--
Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/