[FRIAM] Programming Languages

[Dale Schumacher]

   1. "wherefore" means "why", not "where".
   2. I'm working, not monitoring the lists all day.
   3. The simplest comparison I can come up with is that FRP is more of a
   continuous-signal model and Actors are a discrete-event model. Otherwise
   there are lots of similarities. Actors are reactive program entities with
   private storage, computation resources, and communication facilities for
   sending asynchronous messages to other actors.
   4. I hope that is helpful ;-)


On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:39 AM uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dale? Dale! Wherefore art thou?
>
>
> http://www.dalnefre.com/wp/2020/01/requirements-for-an-actor-programming-language/
>
> On 8/10/20 8:56 AM, jon zingale wrote:
> > This looks pretty interesting. Recently, Marcus posted on FRP models
> which
> > seem to be an alternative (to actor models) route to solving similar
> > problems. Do you have any insight as to their comparative qualities?
>
>
> --
> ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC>
> http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20200810/2b5bccc1/attachment.html>