[FRIAM] tactics and strategy - from vFRIAM 6/12 - attention glen

[Prof David West]

context:

near the end of vFRIAM, SteveG argued that Science's denigration and dismissal of God and religious sensibilities in general was both arrogant (on the part of Science) and divisive / counter-productive. In an attempt to steelman SteveG's position I generalized the argument and made the assertion that this element of the Liberal Democratic strategy to defeat Trump was not only counter-productive, but *extremely stupid*. I also expanded the scope of SteveG's argument away from simply religion but to all the views that might be held by those in Hillary's "basket of deplorables."

glen wishes to 'discuss' my assertion. 

How to proceed? from the general to eventual specifics/particulars? who goes first?

davew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20200612/9c1faf93/attachment.html>