[FRIAM] alternative response

[Marcus Daniels]

Does water vapor have more free will than ice?   

On 6/15/20, 2:42 PM, "Friam on behalf of glen∉ℂ" <friam-bounces at redfish.com on behalf of gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:

    I don't think free will is bound with (naive) morality at all. It's all about selection functions. Do I turn this way or that. Do I eat some food, go for a run, or read a book. So, I don't see it as "importing" anything. Free will is all about which things are bound and which things are free (and which things are partially bound ... constrained).

    On 6/15/20 2:21 PM, Jon Zingale wrote:
    > It seems that the subject of free will is completely bound
    > up in the subject of moral responsibility (especially
    > historically), and often more narrowly bound up with the
    > concept of /good-evil/ dualism. [...] Why do we want to import the technology of free
    > will, and to what application do we find it useful?

    - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
    un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/