[FRIAM] alternative response
Marcus Daniels
marcus at snoutfarm.com
Mon Jun 15 18:25:43 EDT 2020
Ok, I can make an ABM of that. Surely such an ABM does not display free will.
On 6/15/20, 2:42 PM, "Friam on behalf of glen∉ℂ" <friam-bounces at redfish.com on behalf of gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
I don't think free will is bound with (naive) morality at all. It's all about selection functions. Do I turn this way or that. Do I eat some food, go for a run, or read a book. So, I don't see it as "importing" anything. Free will is all about which things are bound and which things are free (and which things are partially bound ... constrained).
On 6/15/20 2:21 PM, Jon Zingale wrote:
> It seems that the subject of free will is completely bound
> up in the subject of moral responsibility (especially
> historically), and often more narrowly bound up with the
> concept of /good-evil/ dualism. [...] Why do we want to import the technology of free
> will, and to what application do we find it useful?
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
More information about the Friam
mailing list