[FRIAM] alternative response

[Marcus Daniels]

But you also gamed this proposition:

< That memory of lost opportunities is what we call free will.  >

Many people apparently believe they can defy their programming and think it is reasonable to expect people to do the same.   But punishing the sin and the sinner are the same, and it only matters if the "trace" ever can be exercised again.  

Marcus

On 6/16/20, 10:52 AM, "Friam on behalf of glen∉ℂ" <friam-bounces at redfish.com on behalf of gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:

    That's exactly what I said. Thanks for repeating it in your own words!

    On 6/16/20 8:40 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
    > We could build a simulation of it, and the simulation won't be able to defy its programming.

    - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
    un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/