[FRIAM] alternative response

[∄ uǝlƃ]

Well, not really. You'd have to take the hike multiple times for you to have exercised any of your freedoms. That's a key part of the construction I offered. The first time you take that *particular* hike and the first time you step either way, there is no freedom. 

(Now, I included some scaffolding for arguing about whether or not you'd have freedom given a previous hike on a *different* ridge, or even the same ridge but 100 years apart.)

On 6/16/20 4:17 PM, thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks, Glen, 
> 
> The following over simplification of your view is NOT meant as satire, only as clarification for my limited purposes:
> 
> I am hiking on an E/ W knife-edge ridge, uncertain which route to take down.  I take a step to the north, which encourages another, and so forth.  I am freed of the tendency to descend down the S. side.   One might call this "freed will."  


-- 
☣ uǝlƃ