[FRIAM] alternative response
∄ uǝlƃ
gepropella at gmail.com
Wed Jun 17 12:03:28 EDT 2020
All of this depends fundamentally on people being willing to play games, rather than make commitments in the first place. Jon's identification of "arguing over base ontological commitments" is simply a symptom of the unwillingness to play games. Everyone takes ideas too seriously. And more importantly, everyone takes their OWN ideas too seriously.
On 6/17/20 8:46 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Jon writes:
>
> < If we attempt to invalidate another's entailment by
> switching the ontological grounds by which they were made, we act in bad
> faith. >
>
> I just want to hear any falsifiable grounding in a commitment. I'm not asking for a lot here.
--
☣ uǝlƃ
More information about the Friam
mailing list