[FRIAM] alternative response

[∄ uǝlƃ]

All of this depends fundamentally on people being willing to play games, rather than make commitments in the first place. Jon's identification of "arguing over base ontological commitments" is simply a symptom of the unwillingness to play games. Everyone takes ideas too seriously. And more importantly, everyone takes their OWN ideas too seriously.

On 6/17/20 8:46 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Jon writes:
> 
> < If we attempt to invalidate another's entailment by
> switching the ontological grounds by which they were made, we act in bad
> faith. >
> 
> I just want to hear any falsifiable grounding in a commitment.   I'm not asking for a lot here. 


-- 
☣ uǝlƃ