[FRIAM] alternative response

[Marcus Daniels]

I think Glen is saying "Don't take the simple story on face value," not necessarily "Read a canonical prescription," and that Eric is saying "The story is inherently ambiguous."   I am probably wrong both times.  :-)

On 6/18/20, 7:33 AM, "Friam on behalf of ∄ uǝlƃ" <friam-bounces at redfish.com on behalf of gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:

    Ha! I have no idea what that means. Google tells me its some ancient Chinese secret <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzixL7Ef-bI>.

    On 6/17/20 9:42 PM, David Eric Smith wrote:
    > 
    >>  read the code. Read the code! READ THE DAMNED CODE!
    > 
    > gate gate paragate parasamgate bodhi svaha


    -- 
    ☣ uǝlƃ

    - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
    un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/