[FRIAM] alternative response
Marcus Daniels
marcus at snoutfarm.com
Thu Jun 18 10:38:59 EDT 2020
I think Glen is saying "Don't take the simple story on face value," not necessarily "Read a canonical prescription," and that Eric is saying "The story is inherently ambiguous." I am probably wrong both times. :-)
On 6/18/20, 7:33 AM, "Friam on behalf of ∄ uǝlƃ" <friam-bounces at redfish.com on behalf of gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
Ha! I have no idea what that means. Google tells me its some ancient Chinese secret <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzixL7Ef-bI>.
On 6/17/20 9:42 PM, David Eric Smith wrote:
>
>> read the code. Read the code! READ THE DAMNED CODE!
>
> gate gate paragate parasamgate bodhi svaha
--
☣ uǝlƃ
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
More information about the Friam
mailing list