[FRIAM] Thanks again Marcus

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

Oh, Jon,  

In sofaras I am able I read this paper.  I don't see how it relates to the
Peircian principle that most sequences of events are random, but that
organisms (including physicists) should be tuned to the ones that aren't.  

I am still wondering if there is any relation between this paper and those
endless lectures on the relation between discontinuity and complexity in the
SFI summer school.  Here is how I get there.  Every real number has an
infinity of information, which I read as, every real number has an infinite
number of digits.  So the numbers that physicists use, which are necessarily
truncated, aren't real numbers.   Did I get anywhere close?  

Nick 

Nicholas Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
Clark University
ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 1:21 PM
To: friam at redfish.com
Subject: [FRIAM] Thanks again Marcus

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10670-019-00165-8#Sec6



--
Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/