[FRIAM] President tested positive for virus
uǝlƃ ↙↙↙
gepropella at gmail.com
Fri Oct 2 11:19:58 EDT 2020
I think he's more interested in making money and impressing his friends than getting sympathy. He'll probably claim hydroxychloroquine cured them:
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-e&tbm=fin&sxsrf=ALeKk01Pbk0Bju7cR8l9ua9Q9pU9ZMSdWg:1601651870441&q=NASDAQ:+SNY&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAONgecRowS3w8sc9YSn9SWtOXmPU5OIKzsgvd80rySypFJLmYoOyBKX4uXj10_UNDVMqLLOMyrMreRaxcvs5Brs4BlopBPtFAgCOu48aSwAAAA&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwizhKqWmpbsAhVSKH0KHTjQClcQ3ecFMAB6BAgfEBk&biw=1413&bih=811#scso=_wER3X46JIrX29AOGk4NA7:0
On 10/2/20 8:00 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Study of his twitter feed might give some indication if there were a change in frequency or tone. Someone on Rachel Maddow’s staff will surely do the exercise. I’m not sure I could endure it.
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Gary Schiltz
> *Sent:* Friday, October 2, 2020 6:21 AM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] President tested positive for virus
>
>
>
> Mr. Cynical checking in here. Does he really have Covid, or is this a ploy to get sympathy votes?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:52 AM Pieter Steenekamp <pieters at randcontrols.co.za <mailto:pieters at randcontrols.co.za>> wrote:
>
> The outcome of this might be some perceived indication of the efficacy of the hydroxychloroquine treatment. I'm not saying a sample size of one has any scientific validity, but sometimes perceptions are more important than reality.
>
> The elephant in the room is how much will the severity of his symptoms influence the election outcome?
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 07:08, Jochen Fromm <jofr at cas-group.net <mailto:jofr at cas-group.net>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Donald tweeted he has tested positive for COVID19
>
> https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1311892190680014849
--
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ
More information about the Friam
mailing list