[FRIAM] President tested positive for virus

[uǝlƃ ↙↙↙]

I think he's more interested in making money and impressing his friends than getting sympathy. He'll probably claim hydroxychloroquine cured them:

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-e&tbm=fin&sxsrf=ALeKk01Pbk0Bju7cR8l9ua9Q9pU9ZMSdWg:1601651870441&q=NASDAQ:+SNY&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAONgecRowS3w8sc9YSn9SWtOXmPU5OIKzsgvd80rySypFJLmYoOyBKX4uXj10_UNDVMqLLOMyrMreRaxcvs5Brs4BlopBPtFAgCOu48aSwAAAA&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwizhKqWmpbsAhVSKH0KHTjQClcQ3ecFMAB6BAgfEBk&biw=1413&bih=811#scso=_wER3X46JIrX29AOGk4NA7:0

On 10/2/20 8:00 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Study of his twitter feed might give some indication if there were a change in frequency or tone.   Someone on Rachel Maddow’s staff will surely do the exercise.   I’m not sure I could endure it.
> 
>  
> 
> *From:* Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Gary Schiltz
> *Sent:* Friday, October 2, 2020 6:21 AM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] President tested positive for virus
> 
>  
> 
> Mr. Cynical checking in here. Does he really have Covid, or is this a ploy to get sympathy votes?
> 
>  
> 
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:52 AM Pieter Steenekamp <pieters at randcontrols.co.za <mailto:pieters at randcontrols.co.za>> wrote:
> 
>     The outcome of this might be some perceived indication of the efficacy of the hydroxychloroquine treatment. I'm not saying a sample size of one has any scientific validity, but sometimes perceptions are more important than reality.
> 
>     The elephant in the room is how much will the severity of his symptoms influence the election outcome?
> 
>      
> 
>     On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 07:08, Jochen Fromm <jofr at cas-group.net <mailto:jofr at cas-group.net>> wrote:
> 
>          
> 
>         Donald tweeted he has tested positive for COVID19
> 
>         https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1311892190680014849

-- 
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ