[FRIAM] now it's personal

[uǝlƃ ↙↙↙]

I wonder about the Joe Rogan podcast as a venue for substantive narratives. I suppose, given the wackos he implicitly advocates by giving them a prominent platform, the emphasis might be placed on *either* "substance" or "narrative" at one's leisure. 

That's one of the reasons I dig things like the Lovecraft mythos or deep nonsense like Chaos Magick, weak on substance and long on narrative. But I suppose, like the targetless model, the narrative itself can be the object of study even if the only substance is the narrative itself ... a kind of impredicative Ouroboros. 

On 10/13/20 10:32 AM, jon zingale wrote:
> I don't know about Joey Six, Christians, or what to do about anything.
> Brian's rhetorical form is pleasant to listen to and the content is clearly
> well researched. He offers a window into an interesting and controversial
> subject in the history of the west. Like when listening to "curator's
> corner", I long for structurally substantive narratives that are rooted in
> empirical findings. Alas like 3-ways, it may be a fetish best kept behind
> closed doors 8^D


-- 
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ