[FRIAM] Eternal questions

[Curt McNamara]

Bucky Fuller on apprehension / comprehension of systems:
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s05/figs/f0901.html

We ignore larger / slower frequencies. We also ignore smaller / faster
frequencies.
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s05/p0600.html#509.01

           Curt

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 9:55 AM uǝlƃ ☤>$ <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ouch! Dude. No! 8^D You're committing the same sin Nick commits. To say we
> "are" our emotions ignores the composition, the algebra by which parts
> compose the whole.
>
> The point is the very high order conscious *attention* to lower order
> frequencies. Not all is one. There are many parts to organize. How are they
> organized?
>
> On 8/26/21 7:50 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
> >
> >>  E.g. when Bob wakes up startled, he interprets the situation into
> "fear". But when Sally wakes up startled, she interprets the situation into
> "excitement" or some other /a priori/, socially limiting, filter category.
> > Thus my earlier suggestion that "we" "are" our emotions?   Bob *is* his
> > propensity to read the lower-level response of "startlement" (closer to
> > autonomic) to "fear" (closer to choice).   Sally also as "excitement".
>
>
> --
> ☤>$ uǝlƃ
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210826/f6362b44/attachment-0001.html>