[FRIAM] yay!

[jon zingale]

Putting aside for a moment the outpouring of news content, which at the
moment, is pressing the discussion of whether or not angry mobs are possible
without social media (seemingly ignoring much of history), I might agree
that data for *the relevance of ethics* are starting to flood in like
Pennsylvania ballots. In fact, much of vFriam this week, seemed to be
dedicated to beating around that bush. It had me in a bit of an *aporia*
though, as I was unsure as to how to proceed. What exactly is wanted from
ethics? My tendency is to put on my philosopher's hat or my scientist's hat,
but more and more I feel doubtful that these tools are the correct ones.
Forlorn, I find myself in a foundationless state of post-modernism,
believing that there can be no analysis besides one situated in power
dynamics and boundary disputes. Please advise.



--
Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/