[FRIAM] incitement

[Marcus Daniels]

My take:  The trial is performative and the Chief Justice's role ceremonial.   If most want him to go down, he goes down.
Where are the votes, though?
-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ???
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 10:14 AM
To: friam at redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] incitement

Right, but that doesn't really answer the question. I suppose it's akin to "living constitution" vs. "originalism". How do we *expect* our individual Senator to make their decision? Does there even need to be any kind of semi-explicit heuristic by which they make such decisions? Can they simply "go with their gut"?

On 1/19/21 10:08 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> It would certainly hit Benjamin Franklin's assertion that impeachment was for those times when the Executive "rendered himself obnoxious" or Hamilton's "those offences which proceed from the misconduct of men, or in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated POLITICAL, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself."

--
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/