[FRIAM] Message to the non-posting 95%
Marcus Daniels
marcus at snoutfarm.com
Thu Jan 28 12:18:36 EST 2021
Some readers want novelty -- they are channel flippers -- and others are looking for an activity or even a process. And then there is a range in between. I'd guess Roger and Nick on opposite ends of that spectrum. I'm a channel flipper until I see something that looks like an itch to scratch or something to puzzle over -- a good distraction.
-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ???
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 8:48 AM
To: friam at redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Message to the non-posting 95%
It's a bit funny. I can't remember who they are. But there are some rare posters whose posts go into GMail spam. It's as if GMail has a similar feature to Spamassassin's *ham* learner. Like the lurker who posts rarely is drowned out as spam because I've allowed the frequent posters to out-ham them. If that's the case, maybe Roger's filter is inverted and has noticed he simply doesn't like *repetitive* stuff. So where mine filters out the rare posters, his filters out the blowhards.
Or, maybe it's because Google has robots who read our emails and the posts they let through are actually a kind of marketing *upsell* technique. "Oh, I see you've failed to mark blatherings from Glen as spam. That means I'll present you with ads for blatherings from The Epoch Times."
I'm thinking about switching to Mailo or Zoho for trash email addresses like my GMail ones. I don't think they read them but who knows?
On 1/27/21 6:14 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Roger is just saying we are boring and that he ignores our posts. gmail follows his preferences.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ???
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:20 PM
> To: FriAM <friam at redfish.com>
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Message to the non-posting 95%
>
> The question I have is whether the similarity is mostly in the payload or mostly in the metadata. I welcome clues from any spam-gurus. I also think it depends on the extent to which your filter is crowdsourced, as well. It strikes me that GMail (and such) users have an economy of scale in recognizing spam that offline bayes filterers don't have.
>
> It would be a fun, but maybe cruel prank to play on someone to get all your friends to mark all emails from some poor shlub as spam so that Google users worldwide began sending their emails to spam.
>
> On 1/27/21 5:07 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
>> This whole thread went into my gmail spam folder.
>>
>>
>> Why is this message in spam?
>>
>> It is similar to messages that were identified as spam in the past.
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
More information about the Friam
mailing list