[FRIAM] Strawman/Steelman
Frank Wimberly
wimberly3 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 31 13:45:14 EST 2021
Yes, certain kinds of speculative and manipulative trading are prohibited
except for entities that have traditionally done it.
I am trying to take advantage of the Gamestop example by buying a small
amount of stock in a similarly positioned firm. It's kind of a lottery
ticket.
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021, 11:15 AM Roger Critchlow <rec at elf.org> wrote:
> But companies and mutual funds are collective investments. Hedge funds
> are collectives. They don't think of themselves that way, but even Elon
> Musk is a huge collective if you take into account everyone who holds some
> kind of stake in Tesla, Spacex, Boring, and so on.
>
> Or are you invoking the collective than which none can be more collective?
>
> Although the argument is made endlessly in terms of individuals versus
> collectives, isn't it really a battle by existing collectives to prevent
> the formation and growth of competitive collectives? The assertion that
> certain forms of "natural" collectives should be more privileged under the
> law and protected from competition from "unnatural" collectives?
>
> -- rec --
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:43 PM Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Eric writes:
>>
>>
>>
>> < The mechanics by which wealth skews place a spectrum of bets within or
>> out of reach, and then the value judgments of the specific bets particular
>> actors take, are both things to be understood. I find arguments
>> frustrating in which one tries to get a clear picture of the mechanics, and
>> suddenly the conversation gets overwrought about valuations, as if the two
>> were the same topic. >
>>
>>
>>
>> One could imagine making the discretionary spending by the NIH opt-in on
>> taxes. Since many pharmaceutical patents build on research funded by the
>> NIH, the government could insist on a better rate on drugs than those that
>> did not opt-in to that taxation. Patents could be blocked without a
>> convincing examination of supporting research. “Oh I see you opted-out
>> on NIH research on your 1040, your chimeric antigen receptor treatment bill
>> will be $500k. Here is a CareCredit application.” (Sadly that’s the
>> situation for most people, now.)
>>
>>
>>
>> If a large fraction of people don’t to even want to acknowledge the need
>> for collective investments, it should be no surprise when the rest take
>> matters in to their own hands, or use it as leverage to profit.
>>
>>
>>
>> Marcus
>> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
>> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210131/bdda9fcc/attachment.html>
More information about the Friam
mailing list