[FRIAM] The epiphenomenality relation

[Marcus Daniels]

I just don't see how that is a "loop" except that repeated application of such a matrix could lead to oscillation.    It sounded like somehow causality was violated and not just obscured.

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of ? glen
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2021 3:38 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The epiphenomenality relation

Right, high dimension. More important than the matrix being large is that it has non-zero cross terms.

On November 28, 2021 8:42:37 AM PST, Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com> wrote:
>The operators are large (in the sense of a matrix) whether or not they are intended to be?
>
>> On Nov 28, 2021, at 6:20 AM, ⛧ glen <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Any of the evolutionary operators across scales, from energy exchange at the finest to ecosystem reengineering at the coarsest.
>> 
>>> On November 27, 2021 7:33:15 AM PST, Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com> wrote:
>>> I’ve heard these words from you Glen, but I have no idea what these loops are or what you might be talking about.
>>> 
-- 
glen ⛧


.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/