[FRIAM] Deep learning training material
Pieter Steenekamp
pieters at randcontrols.co.za
Mon Jan 9 03:29:06 EST 2023
@Russ,
a) I appreciate the suggestion to include a simple neural network that can
make predictions based on inputs and be trained using steepest descent to
optimize its weights. This would be a valuable addition to my training
material, as it provides a foundational understanding of how neural
networks work.
b) My focus is on providing practical training for professionals with deep
domain knowledge but limited software experience, who are looking to
utilize deep learning as a tool in their respective fields. In contrast, it
seems that your focus is on understanding the inner workings of deep
learning. Both approaches have their own merits, and it is important to
cater to the needs and goals of different learners.
Pieter
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 21:20, Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com> wrote:
> The main defects of both R and Python are a lack of a typing system and
> high performance compilation. I find R still follows (is used by) the
> statistics research community more than Python. Common Lisp was always
> better than either.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 8, 2023, at 11:03 AM, Russ Abbott <russ.abbott at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> As indicated in my original reply, my interest in this project grows from
> my relative ignorance of Deep Learning. My career has focussed exclusively
> on symbolic computing. I've worked with and taught (a) functional
> programming, logic programming, and related issues in advanced Python; (b)
> complex systems, agent-based modeling, genetic algorithms, and related
> evolutionary processes, (c) a bit of constraint programming, especially in
> MiniZinc, and (d) reinforcement learning as Q-learning, which is
> reinforcement learning without neural nets. I've always avoided neural
> nets--and more generally numerical programming of any sort.
>
> Deep learning has produced so many impressive results that I've decided to
> devote much of my retirement life to learning about it. I retired at the
> end of Spring 2022 and (after a break) am now devoting much of my time to
> learning more about Deep Neural Nets. So far, I've dipped my brain into it
> at various points. I think I've learned a fair amount. For example,
>
> - I now know how to build a neural net (NN) that adds two numbers
> using a single layer with a single neuron. It's really quite simple and is,
> I think, a beautiful example of how NNs work. If I were to teach an intro
> to NNs I'd start with this.
> - I've gone through the Kaggle Deep Learning sequence mentioned
> earlier.
> - I found a paper that shows how you can approximate
> any differentiable function to any degree of accuracy with a single-layer
> NN. (This is a very nice result, although I believe it's not used
> explicitly in building serious Deep NN systems.)
> - From what I've seen so far, most serious DNNs are built using Keras
> rather than PyTorch.
> - I've looked at Jeremy Howard's fast.ai material. I was going to go
> through the course but stopped when I found that it uses PyTorch. Also, it
> seems to be built on fast.ai libraries that do a lot of the work for
> you without explanation. And it seems to focus almost exclusively on
> Convolutional NNs.
> - My impression of DNNs is that to a great extent they are *ad hoc*.
> There is no good way to determine the best architecture to use for a given
> problem. By architecture, I mean the number of layers, the number of
> neurons in each layer, the types of layers, the activation functions to
> use, etc.
> - All DNNs that I've seen use Python as code glue rather than R or
> some other language. I like Python--so I'm pleased with that.
> - To build serious NNs one should learn the Python libraries Numpy
> (array manipulation) and Pandas (data processing). Numpy especially seems
> to be used for virtually all DNNs that I've seen.
> - Keras and probably PyTorch include a number of special-purpose
> neurons and layers that can be included in one's DNN. These include: a
> DropOut layer, LSTM (short-long-term memory) neurons, convolutional layers,
> recurrent neural net layers (RNN), and more recently transformers, which
> get credit for ChatGPT and related programs. My impression is that these
> special-purpose layers are *ad hoc* in the same sense that functions
> or libraries that one finds useful in a programming language are *ad
> hoc*. They have been very important for the success of DNNs, but they
> came into existence because people invented them in the same way that
> people invented useful functions and libraries.
> - NN libraries also include a menagerie of activation functions. An
> activation function acts as the final control on the output of a layer.
> Different activation functions are used for different purposes. To be
> successful in building a DNN, one must understand what those activation
> functions do for you and which ones to use.
> - I'm especially interested in DNNs that use reinforcement learning.
> That's because the first DNN work that impressed me was DeepMind's DNNs
> that learned to play Atari games--and then Go, etc. An important advantage
> of Reinforcement Learning (RL) is that it doesn't depend on mountains of
> labeled data.
> - I find RL systems more interesting than image recognition systems.
> One of the striking features of many image recognition systems is that they
> can be thrown off by changing a small number of pixels in an image. The
> changed image would look to a human observer just like the original, but it
> might fool a trained NN into labeling the image as a banana rather than,
> say, an automobile, which is what it really is. To address this problem
> people have developed Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) which attempt
> to find such weaknesses in a neural net during training and then to train
> the NN not to have those weaknesses. This is a fascinating result, but as
> far as I can tell, it mainly shows how fragile some NNs are and doesn't add
> much conceptual depth to one's understanding of how NNs work.
>
> I'm impressed with this list of things I sort of know. If you had asked me
> before I started writing this email I wouldn't have thought I had learned
> as much as I have. Even so, I feel like I don't understand much of it
> beyond a superficial level.
>
> So far I've done all my exploration using Google's Colab (Google's Python
> notebook implementation) and Kaggle's similar Python
> notebook implementation. (I prefer Colab to Kaggle.) Using either one, it's
> super nice not to have to download and install anything!
>
> I'm continuing my journey to learn more about DNNs. I'd be happy to have
> company and to help develop materials to teach about DNNs. (Developing
> teaching materials always helps me learn the subject being covered.)
>
> -- Russ Abbott
> Professor Emeritus, Computer Science
> California State University, Los Angeles
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 1:48 AM glen <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, the money/expertise bar is still pretty high. But TANSTAAFL still
>> applies. And the overwhelming evidence is coming in that specific models do
>> better than those trained up on diverse data sets, "better" meaning less
>> prone to subtle bullsh¡t. What I find fascinating is tools like OpenAI
>> *facilitate* trespassing. We have a wonderful bloom of non-experts claiming
>> they understand things like "deep learning". But do they? An old internet
>> meme is brought to mind: "Do you even Linear Algebra, bro?" >8^D
>>
>> On 1/8/23 01:06, Jochen Fromm wrote:
>> > I have finished a number of Coursera courses recently, including "Deep
>> Learning & Neural Networks with Keras" which was ok but not great. The
>> problems with deep learning are
>> >
>> > * to achieve impressive results like chatGPT from OpenAi or LaMDA from
>> Goggle you need to spend millions on hardware
>> > * only big organisations can afford to create such expensive models
>> > * the resulting network is s black box and it is unclear why it works
>> the way it does
>> >
>> > In the end it is just the same old back propagation that has been known
>> for decades, just on more computers and trained on more data. Peter Norvig
>> calls it "The unreasonable effectiveness of data"
>> > https://research.google.com/pubs/archive/35179.pdf
>> >
>> > -J.
>> >
>> >
>> > -------- Original message --------
>> > From: Russ Abbott <russ.abbott at gmail.com>
>> > Date: 1/8/23 12:20 AM (GMT+01:00)
>> > To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
>> friam at redfish.com>
>> > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Deep learning training material
>> >
>> > Hi Pieter,
>> >
>> > A few comments.
>> >
>> > * Much of the actual deep learning material looks like it came from
>> the Kaggle "Deep Learning <
>> https://www.kaggle.com/learn/intro-to-deep-learning>" sequence.
>> > * In my opinion, R is an ugly and /ad hoc/ language. I'd stick to
>> Python.
>> > * More importantly, I would put the How-to-use-Python stuff into a
>> preliminary class. Assume your audience knows how to use Python and focus
>> on Deep Learning. Given that, there is only a minimal amount of information
>> about Deep Learning in the write-up. If I were to attend the workshop and
>> thought I would be learning about Deep Learning, I would be
>> disappointed--at least with what's covered in the write-up.
>> >
>> > I say this because I've been looking for a good intro to Deep
>> Learning. Even though I taught Computer Science for many years, and am now
>> retired, I avoided Deep Learning because it was so non-symbolic. My focus
>> has always been on symbolic computing. But Deep Learning has produced so
>> many extraordinarily impressive results, I decided I should learn more
>> about it. I haven't found any really good material. If you are interested,
>> I'd be more than happy to work with you on developing some introductory
>> Deep Learning material.
>> >
>> > -- Russ Abbott
>> > Professor Emeritus, Computer Science
>> > California State University, Los Angeles
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 11:31 AM Pieter Steenekamp <
>> pieters at randcontrols.co.za <mailto:pieters at randcontrols.co.za>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks to the kind support of OpenAI's chatGPT, I am in the process
>> of gathering materials for a comprehensive and hands-on deep learning
>> workshop. Although it is still a work in progress, I welcome any interested
>> parties to take a look and provide their valuable input. Thank you!
>> >
>> > You can get it from:
>> >
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/eyx4iumb0439wlx/deep%20learning%20training%20rev%2005012023.zip?dl=0
>> <
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/eyx4iumb0439wlx/deep%20learning%20training%20rev%2005012023.zip?dl=0
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ
>>
>> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
>> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>> archives: 5/2017 thru present
>> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>> 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: 5/2017 thru present
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
> 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: 5/2017 thru present
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
> 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20230109/188d0dea/attachment.html>
More information about the Friam
mailing list