[FRIAM] why musk bought twitter

steve smith sasmyth at swcp.com
Mon Aug 5 19:55:43 EDT 2024 

Re: effing the ineffable - I've Just been listening to Douglas 
Hofstadter's latest book/, //Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel 
and Fire of Thinking /and trying to resolve it against my recent 
thoughts and readings around adjacent possibles, and assembly theoretic 
models of life, the universe and everything.

Spatial and topological Pattern 
formation/projection/matching/gesturing/interpolating/extrapolating?

As a strange coincidence I am now reading (listening to) Will and Ariel 
Durant's The Lesson's of History which opened with a very assembly 
theoretic observation: "The present is all of history rolled up to 
facilitate action while history is the way we roll up the past to 
understand the present" (or somesuch)...

I suspect for the more hard-core Math/CS folks here there is a Godelian 
argument to be made for analog/biological machines (e.g. Human Nervous 
system with or without Broca's Area) being capable of generating 
complexity that exceeds (exponentially, geometrically?) the complexity 
of a similar amount of matter/energy engaged in digital combinatorics?   
-mumble-

- Steve

BTW: in reference to the actual thread Subject...  I was very disturbed 
by the first hour of the 9 hour drop of Neuralink podcast Lex just 
made...  specifically Musk's talk about Trump and Lex's polite deference 
to Musk (aka elno).   The bigger picture of Neuralink progress is pretty 
impressive both from the technological implications of minituarizing all 
that stuff to operate in a biologically active/corrosive environment 
wirelessly and then obtaining a fascinating hybrid between biological 
neural nets and digital ones...  and as someone with one foot (hip) into 
cyborgia... I refer you to:

    Machine Man/by Max Barry//. This novel follows the character Charlie
    Neumann, an engineer who, after losing a leg in an industrial
    accident, begins to replace parts of his body with high-tech
    prosthetics. This leads to a series of deliberate amputations and
    enhancements as he becomes obsessed with the idea of upgrading his
    body beyond its natural limitations. The book explores themes of
    identity, technology, and the implications of modifying the human
    body///

/
/

On 8/5/24 9:21 AM, Prof David West wrote:
> Minor comment from a :metaphor obsessed colleague." I am teaching an honors course at the University of St. Thomas in the spring: Effing the Ineffable, with a colleague who teaches Theology. The basic premise: you just had this extraordinary experience and you want to communicate/share it with others. How do you do so?"  Metaphor, obviously.
>
> Case studies will cover a spectrum from Michael Jordan-like "in the zone" experiences to acid trips to Moses and the burning bush to J. Smith and the golden plates. We are undecided if we dare include Mohamed as a case study even though all other religions and mystical traditions are fair game. One thread in the acid-trip area is how contemporary science has provide a host of new metaphors from the realm of physics, etc. that can be utilized to provide a more "accurate" or "satisfying" Effing.
>
> davew
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024, at 9:07 AM, glen wrote:
>> These are all fine propositions. But, as you point out, sacrificing his
>> status doesn't rationally add up. Snyder's proposing a solution to
>> that. To boot, Snyder's proposition attempts to explain a bunch of
>> other "data" (like the way we use our smartphones and exhibit a
>> tendency toward conspiracy theories, gurus, and alternate facts -
>> oracular truth).
>>
>> One thing not quite addressed by Snyder is the apparent rationalism in
>> things like longtermism, effective altruism, etc. For that, I think
>> he'd have to flesh out how actual/useful/realist truth dovetails with
>> oracular/mystical truth. He mentions during his talk that, of course
>> actual tech (like starting a fire) is involved in oracular truth. You
>> have to start the fire and burn some incense to enthrall your victims.
>> I think, here is where our metaphor-obsessed colleagues could apply
>> their skills. Where is, eg, "fire" an actual thing and where is it a
>> metaphor (eg Prometheus). When should the guru discourage metaphor (the
>> fire doesn't matter!, pay attention to my hand movements) and when
>> should they encourage it?
>>
>> The New Rationalists (including Singerian EA) are masters of metaphor,
>> either being guided to focus on a small slice of reality or guiding
>> others to do so, abstracting out some stupid thought experiment like
>> kids falling into ponds or Trolleys headed toward clueless weirdos
>> standing on train tracks. Such metaphor is a proven manipulation tactic
>> used by gurus like Rasputin or Plato the world over.
>>
>> Which of the witches are actually also enthralled and which are
>> Barnum-style manipulators? To me, Thiel seems like the latter and Musk
>> seems like the former.
>>
>> On 8/2/24 13:52, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>>> Perhaps realizing his interests require tapping government resources and many trillions of dollars.   I could see that for that it might make sense to use Twitter to manipulate the media and create the political support for his agenda(s).  Maybe it even makes sense to want Trump elected so that social service spending will be stopped, and more money can be redirected to his Mechzilla projects.   Perhaps he finds an open society creates too many competing goals, and, by supporting authoritarian thinking and Trump in particular, he anticipates a government that is easier to focus the way he likes.   What doesn't add up is that it was already going well for him with relatively wealthy Americans, and then he trashed his reputation and the profitability of Tesla for no apparent good reason.  The kind of people that will now by an Audi E-Tron instead of a Model S, or an Ionic 5 instead of a Model 3.   He also seems way too engaged in topics like transgender rights and immigration.    None of these issues need influence his life at all.   It is as if he really believes some of the peculiar things he says.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Friam<friam-bounces at redfish.com>  On Behalf Of glen
>>> Sent: Friday, August 2, 2024 11:45 AM
>>> To:friam at redfish.com
>>> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] why musk bought twitter
>>>
>>> I clearly don't understand. Snyder's explanation is that Elno is a god, and views himself as a god (or the weaker concept of a hero). So Elno is both building/burying his hoard so that it'll be available across the transition *and* Lying to his flock such that they sacrifice to him in order to engage in projects that will ensure the transition happens and that he and his flock will exist on the other side.
>>>
>>> None of that is nihilist. What am I missing?
>>>
>>> On 8/2/24 11:32, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>>>> I was addressing Snyder's recommendation rather than the development of Elon's personality.  Assuming the personality Elon presents is really his.  I suspect it is, which would be kind of a disappointment.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Friam<friam-bounces at redfish.com>  On Behalf Of glen
>>>> Sent: Friday, August 2, 2024 11:25 AM
>>>> To:friam at redfish.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] why musk bought twitter
>>>>
>>>> IDK. That sounds like you projecting onto Elno, rather than an explanation that relies on Elno's [hi]story. His narrative arc is (as Harris laid out in his video) is "the potential of humankind". And that doesn't seem nihilist to me. Maybe he's become one, of course. As Harris states in the video, when he became the richest man, a qualitative shift may have taken place. Harris argues the shift was he bought Twitter because he *need* conflict and obstacles to overcome. Maybe you could argue the qualitative change was that he became a nihilist when his hoard met that criterion. But because he continues to be an "AI Doomer" (at least in rhetoric and an accelerationist in action), there's some sort of Rawlsian curtain, like the singularity ... something on the other side of the transition - and an attempt to bury one's hoard so that it's available on the other side. And I think that eschatological conception fits better with his narrative arc than a nihilistic one.
>>>>
>>>> On 8/2/24 11:11, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>>>>> My standard answer to this is -- given the neural reference frame of nihilism -- is why not try some grand social experiments.  There is no Purpose, so causing harm in the short term, or for that matter long term, ultimately doesn't matter.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Friam<friam-bounces at redfish.com>  On Behalf Of glen
>>>>> Sent: Friday, August 2, 2024 8:12 AM
>>>>> To:friam at redfish.com
>>>>> Subject: [FRIAM] why musk bought twitter
>>>>>
>>>>> This guy does what I think is a good job demonstrating that Elno's stated reasons (free speech, liberal bias, censorship) for buying Twitter were false:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Problem With Elon Musk
>>>>> https://youtu.be/WYQxG4KEzvo?si=oXumcC8aqsYMTzdC&t=1487
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, we can project whatever fantasies we want into the mind of an oligarch like Elno. But if we're trying to do a good job, find an explanation that's "hard to vary" (ala Deutsch), we're left empty handed. However Timothy Snyder provides us with something I think's intriguing; and it reflects various other arguments I've made, here, about TESCREAL<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TESCREAL>.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's where I heard Snyder's setup:
>>>>>
>>>>> The New Paganism: How the Postmodern Became the Premodern
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Nr2Q2zGNC8
>>>>>
>>>>> Appended below is Claude's summary of the talk. But the essence is that these people "believe" (somehow) they can "take it with them" in a similar way to the pagans (e.g. Vikings, Egyptians, etc.) believing they could hoard their stuff and somehow have access to it in the next life. This reflects well, I think, Musk's objectives for SpaceX, Tesla, breeding children, etc. It's somewhere between believing in souls, one's legacy, and spreading humanity (not biology, of course, but humanity) throughout the universe.
>>>>>
>>>>> My guess is most of our Oligarchs will give lip service to spiritual beliefs like Christianity or whatever, but are actually more atheistic in their ephemerides. But if you spend enough time arguing about atheism, you consistently find people (even atheistic people) asking for Purpose (with a capital P). Why are we here? What should we be doing? Etc. Despite our overwhelming rationalism/justificationism, many (most?) of us still seek that grand arch. And those of us who are *lucky* enough to be extraordinarily successful (in whatever domain) are at the most risk for this irrational/fideistic, paganist, TESCREAL Purpose. I think it's a relatively strong hypothesis for why Musk bought Twitter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Claude's summary:
>>>>>> - Snyder argues that conventional explanations based on rationality and interests fail to adequately explain the rise of right-wing populist movements and figures like Trump, Putin, and Musk. Instead, he proposes analyzing these phenomena through the lens of what he calls "neopaganism."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - He identifies four key dimensions of neopaganism: value, sacrifice, charisma, and oracular truth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - On value, he argues today's oligarchs hoard wealth as if they can "take it with them" after death, similar to pagan burial practices.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - On sacrifice, he contends oligarchs are sacrificing the earth itself through climate change, taking the world down with them. Putin's invasion of Ukraine also has a sacrificial logic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Charismatic leaders tell big lies to create an alternate reality their followers live inside. Trump and Putin exemplify this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Modern technology, especially smartphones, function as pagan "oracles" - sources of addictive but often deceptive truth that make us more stupid over time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Snyder believes the humanities are crucial for reflecting on these issues and finding a way out of our current crisis. A narrow, failed rationality has enabled these destructive dynamics. What's needed is a richer, more reflective notion of human freedom.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In summary, Snyder argues we need to understand the pagan-like irrationality and destructiveness driving our world today in order to have any hope of countering it. The humanities provide essential resources for this task.
>> -- 
>> ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ
>> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
>> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>> to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>> archives:  5/2017 thru present
>> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>    1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>    1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20240805/eb043cdf/attachment.html>

More information about the Friam mailing list