[FRIAM] flattening -isms

[uǝlƃ ☣]

So, here's a question that's been percolating as I've listened to Philip Goff talk about his form of panpsychism <https://thepanpsycast.com/panpsycast>. Is it consistent [†] for a person to be:

  1) A behaviorist, 
  2) A methodological pluralist, and
  3) A monist.

It seems to me that (1) and (2) prevent (3). 

[†] Note that it's fine to be inconsistent. As an admitted pluralist, I'd be inconsistent to disallow inconsistency. 8^) Or, maybe it's better to say, in order to be consistent, I must allow inconsistency.

On 11/17/19 11:27 AM, Nick Thompson wrote:
> Well, I should have conceded this point long ago:  of course I am a è/methodological //ç /pluralist.  There are many ways to skin a cat. 

-- 
☣ uǝlƃ