[FRIAM] square land math question

[Frank Wimberly]

Sorry.  I only took math courses in grad school until I was 29 years old
and at that time OO didn't exist as far as I know.  Databases were just
coming into prominence as an area of study.  The dissertations that were
published in my department the year I finished were all in database topics
except mine, which was in numerical analysis.  I did teach data structures
for many years.

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020, 4:21 PM uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree. I think Frank is simply prejudiced toward his way of thinking
> about math. Both relational (normalized) databases and OO databases can be
> mathematically well-founded. I don't know, but suspect, they're even dual.
>
> On 7/23/20 3:08 PM, Edward Angel wrote:
> > There really does not need to be a difference, Coordinate free geometry
> is much like vector analysis. You have the equivalent of axioms and I
> suppose if you so desire you can bring in formal proofs and all the other
> concepts you like. But what it does for me is give a unified view of linear
> algebra, odes and geometry as just different instantiations of the same
> objects and their methods.
>
> --
> ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC>
> http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20200723/32d6e0e8/attachment.html>