[FRIAM] GPT-3 and the chinese room

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

Jon, 

 

In my attempt not to bend this thread I have now created thread chaos.  Damn!

 

My problem with the Turing Test Game is that it’s never played honestly.  Give me a computer that can glare continuously at it’s opponent for 20 minutes at a time and I will give you a chess-playing computer.  Give me a computer than can cough just as its opponent is choosing a card, and I will give you a poker-playing computer.  Give me a computer than can frisk about, enticing other computers to join it in the frisking, and I will give you a joyous computer.  

 

Nick 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com <mailto:ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com> 

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 12:19 PM
To: friam at redfish.com
Subject: [FRIAM] GPT-3 and the chinese room

 

>From my perspective, it is helpful to consider a larger history of the
consciousness debate. In what could be considered the beginning of the
end of African slavery in the west, natural philosophers would seek to
find in the physiology of black men structures to explain their inferiority
and in some extreme cases their inhumanity. Neal Stephenson, in his Baroque
Cycle (~)trilogy, caricatures how embarrassing white people be when in the
pursuit of the consciousness question. In the novel, a Nigerian born
linguist named Dappa attempts, through the power of words and ideas, to
argue for the freedom of enslaved people in the west (circa the 1660s).
Meanwhile, many spectators look on and muse about how nearly human Dappa's
arguments sound, but ultimately must not be confused with the utterances
of a reasoning being. Stephenson highlights the cruelty and tyranny that
enterprises like these can create. The Turing test generally reeks of
this sort of pursuit. Rather than beginning with the assumption that the
other experiences and then wondering what that experience is like, we set up
an endless procession of tests which on the one hand we hope will converge
in the limit to understanding, and which on the other will entertain us
in the meantime. The Turing test has appeared to me to be a horrible
diversion from the discovery of more promising methodologies. One day,
perhaps there will be a construction that passes all acceptable Turing
tests, and this day will be a sad day because we will likely still have no
answers to our initial investigations regarding what it is to be conscious
and what it is to experience as another does. Perhaps, the question will
be considered solved for all time and the potential needed to reopen
the topic exceedingly expensive. Somewhere, Minsky expressed remorse for
how some of his results in the field of AI had managed to close the general
AI question for decades, ultimately shifting the pursuit away from the hard
question and instead towards the pursuit of novel gadgets. In the spirit
of EricC's comments about the distinction of surface tension and PH, if
consciousness is a thing, then it should be so whether or not we all agree.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20200728/64ea1a48/attachment.html>