[FRIAM] alternative response

[glen∉ℂ]

I don't think free will is bound with (naive) morality at all. It's all about selection functions. Do I turn this way or that. Do I eat some food, go for a run, or read a book. So, I don't see it as "importing" anything. Free will is all about which things are bound and which things are free (and which things are partially bound ... constrained).

On 6/15/20 2:21 PM, Jon Zingale wrote:
> It seems that the subject of free will is completely bound
> up in the subject of moral responsibility (especially
> historically), and often more narrowly bound up with the
> concept of /good-evil/ dualism. [...] Why do we want to import the technology of free
> will, and to what application do we find it useful?