[FRIAM] Warring Darwinians for Glen, Steve

[uǝlƃ ☣]

On 5/1/20 8:41 AM, thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:
> First, remember, a proper monist shouldn't talk about his "stuff",whatever it is, as if it is distinguishable from other "stuff",  because that is dualism, full stop.  So I really shouldn’t be doing this at all.

That's just nonsense. Even if there's 1 substance, it can take 2 forms. We can distinguish ice from water even though it's the same stuff.

> */[NST===> [...] But putting aside w’s warning for a moment, let me just say that I don’t think we have different kinds of comprehension here, but comprehensions of different types of objects.  <===nst] /*

I disagree. I think we're talking about different *ways* of organizing the ambient muck ... i.e. different comprehensions.

-- 
☣ uǝlƃ