[FRIAM] Warring Darwinians for Glen, Steve

[uǝlƃ ☣]

However, I think we can come up with a (maybe someday) testable hypothesis based on hidden states. In principle, if EricC's principle is taken seriously, the inner world of a black box device will be *completely* represented on its surface (ala the holographic principle). Any information not exhibited by a black box's *behavior* will be lost/random. 

This implies something about the compressibility and information content of the black box's behavior, right? 

On 5/5/20 10:38 AM, Prof David West wrote:
> This does not advance an argument against the possibility of a computer thinking — merely an assertion that "behavior" is not a valid basis upon which to argue that they do.


-- 
☣ uǝlƃ