[FRIAM] Movement vs. Behavior, and what's in the Black Box

Frank Wimberly wimberly3 at gmail.com
Tue May 12 13:45:11 EDT 2020


Less public.  Last I heard with fMRI they might be able to detect that
you're thinking of a coffee cup.  I rarely think of cups.  Could the detect
that I was thinking of a covariant tensor?

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Tue, May 12, 2020, 10:58 AM Jon Zingale <jonzingale at gmail.com> wrote:

> Glen, Eric,
>
> I am enjoying how the conversation is developing. The celery
> example strikes me as being important, but where Glen refers
> to *scale* I would speak of *domain of definition*. That a shift in
> domain happens to be size, rather than some other contextual
> specification, may not be what we want. If this isn't the case
> Glen, please let me know. With respect to Eric's points it seems
> fair to me to say that a paddle wheel is behaving, but perhaps not
> in the *larger* context of the river. The celery is behaving, but not
> not in the *smaller* context of capillary action. Here I am using
> the language of *large* and *small*, but perhaps other modalities
> have a place as well. One can say Nick's behavior appears
> spontaneously, but in fact was necessitated by something *prior*.
> Here an *earlier* Nick could play the role of the river.
>
> Frank,
> Would you say that the mind is as public as RSA encryption?
> .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ...
> .... . ...
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20200512/d1f5a2a2/attachment.html>


More information about the Friam mailing list