[FRIAM] Cringe

Prof David West profwest at fastmail.fm
Thu May 14 17:48:16 EDT 2020


they are — but only for those in the know. There is such a thing as "numerology porn," but I won't help you find it.

davew


On Thu, May 14, 2020, at 3:17 PM, thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:
> I've never understood why 99 and 66 aren't equally salacious.  
> 
> n
> 
> Nicholas Thompson
> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
> Clark University
> ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>  
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ?
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 3:00 PM
> To: FriAM <friam at redfish.com>
> Subject: [FRIAM] Cringe
> 
> We talk a lot about filosofy, culture, and politics on this list. And 
> we quote a lot of old white guys. Sporadically one of us will lament 
> about how difficult it is to keep up with tech or cultural concepts 
> like trolls. Well, I've posted at least 1 video from her before. But if 
> you ever want an excellent synthesis of many of these topics, Wynn is 
> fantastic. I got tired of Sanderson's understated sense of humor 
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYO_jab_esuFRV4b17AJtAw> [†] the 
> other day and instead watched Natalie explain the modern evolution of 
> "cringe":
> 
>   https://youtu.be/vRBsaJPkt2Q?t=4607
> 
> I've given you the summary slide time link, there. But I highly 
> recommend the whole video. I could quote mine her for days:
> 
> "You know I've met people who never cringe at themselves. And ... let's 
> just say ... they're not my kind of people."
> 
> "If it's any consolation ... uh ... nothing matters."
> 
> 
> [†] E.g. The other day he asked the audience to vote for their favorite 
> number ... they picked "69" and his justification went like: "... 
> which, I assume, is because if you take all of the natural numbers 
> between 1 and 9, and then you look at the divisors of each one of 
> those, you look at the numbers and list all of their divisors and you 
> add up the divisors, it adds up to 69. And adding up divisors like this 
> is a very fun and common thing in number theory so ..."
> 
> Yeeeaaaahhhh. That's it. They picked 69 because it's fun to add up 
> divisors. >8^D
> 
> --
> ☣ uǝlƃ
> 
> .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- 
> ... .... . ...
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam unsubscribe 
> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
> 
> 
> .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- 
> ... .... . ...
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
>



More information about the Friam mailing list