[FRIAM] Shorthands for Brain-stuff

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

Sorry.  Forgot your second question   See below:

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

 <mailto:ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com> ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2020 9:11 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Shorthands for Brain-stuff

 

 

MGD>  In your model intents come from the l.teleonomicus, machinery that follows the same rules of physics as everything else.

[NST===>Yes, but not just those laws.  <===nst] 

 

What other rules?  There are rules that override physics?  How is that lump of goo different from any other lump of goo?[NST===>lumps of goo can differ in their structure.  <===nst]  

 

Marcus

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20201004/d3f0fcdf/attachment.html>