[FRIAM] deductive fidelity (was Re: ideas are lies)

[uǝlƃ ↙↙↙]

Well, I want to agree in the near-term. Social democracy seems to me like a decent path toward a relatively practical anarchy. And your suggestions are good social democratic proposals. But the old criticism from the anarchists still applies. Any time you install a "hard" organization, it becomes difficult to remove when it goes obsolete [⛧]. So, the emphasis should be on the observe/accept and fix, hearkening back to Strevens' "iron rule", I guess.


[⛧] ... deliberately avoiding the asymmetric power sugar the anarchists always, irritatingly, use. Its not really about power. It's about agility. But the power rhetoric provides a nice whistle for the disenfranchised, a way to manipulate them, leveraging their brand of individualism, different from the self-made man type, but no less nefarious.

On 9/29/20 12:27 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Don't appeal to "soft" organizations like churches and charities to fix the things that government leaves broken.   That leaves power (to abuse) on the table.   Design it to _work_.    Observe (or accept) the hard consequences of rigid and incorrect systems and fix (or ignore) them.    


-- 
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ