[FRIAM] Dancing Robots

Frank Wimberly wimberly3 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 3 15:07:09 EDT 2021


The last task Raibert mentioned to me before I was promoted and hired by
another school was to develop a standard representation for the
"trajectory" of a robot.  This would have been a set of time series for
each "joint" etc.

I wish I hadn't left but I'm sure that task has been accomplished.

F

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Sat, Apr 3, 2021, 12:58 PM Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com> wrote:

> For all the hype, robots are limited in what they can do in your home -
> The Washington Post
> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/03/23/future-robots-home-jetsons/>
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Frank Wimberly
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 3, 2021 11:24 AM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam at redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Dancing Robots
>
>
>
> You darned cynics
>
>
>
>
> https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/darpa-selects-boston-dynamics-humanoid-for-robotics-challenge
>
>
>
> https://www.themarlincompany.com/blog-articles/more-robots-workplace/
>
>
>
> https://youtu.be/JGNopwFcz3A
>
>
>
> I'll find some aiding-the-handicapped examples if you like.
>
>
>
> Frank
>
> ---
> Frank C. Wimberly
> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
> Santa Fe, NM 87505
>
> 505 670-9918
> Santa Fe, NM
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021, 10:46 AM Steve Smith <sasmyth at swcp.com> wrote:
>
> The "dancing" robots certainly are compelling to view, though I can see
> why Gary asked if it was real or memorex (CGI)... there was enough uncanny
> valley going on in their moves to make it clear that they were following a
> prescribed choreography.   The miniscule detail in the dance moves is what
> I *think* makes it impressive.   I am doubting that the proportions and
> range of motion/etc of the robotic humanoids is as close to humans' as
> implied by the constraints (in software, in choreography) imposed.
>
> I also wonder how much of this is essentially driven by something like
> MoCap that is then tweaked to match the dynamical performance
> envelope/constraints of the robot simulacrum?   Or by derivation, ws ther
> some kind of machine learning going on on a *suite* of human MoCap data
> sets.   Or is there a very capable cyber-choreographer who implicitly
> understands the robot's "coupled impedance elements" in a way that allows
> them to hack/hint/nuance the instructions down to this level of performance?
>
> Are these class of robots targeted for mission-spec autonomy or are they
> more targeted to default to being Waldos with some self-driving constraints?
>
> I haven't tracked whether the Laban Notation movement has actually been
> useful to extend into robotic-motion...  it starts to seem relevant once
> humanoid Robots are presented dancing human-dances.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laban_movement_analysis
>
> The "impressive illusion" is that these Robots are responding to the music
> itself and to one another (couples dancing) in  a way that seems highly
> doubtful.   They appear to be merely very artful puppets with wireless
> "strings".    No small feat, bringing them to this point, but the most
> interesting/impressive aspects are likely careful bit-chiseling on the
> instruction sets.
>
>
>
> It would be more impressive if they were helping an elderly person go to
> the bathroom.   Chasing a person in irregular terrain would be convincing
> too.
>
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2021, at 9:00 AM, Gary Schiltz <gary at naturesvisualarts.com>
> <gary at naturesvisualarts.com> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Thanks for letting me know. In that case, it is truly mind blowing. I had
> no idea robotic tech had come so far.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 10:57 AM Frank Wimberly <wimberly3 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Real!!
>
> ---
> Frank C. Wimberly
> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
> Santa Fe, NM 87505
>
> 505 670-9918
> Santa Fe, NM
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021, 9:50 AM Gary Schiltz <gary at naturesvisualarts.com>
> wrote:
>
> Serious question, since I didn't make it to vfriam yesterday. With the
> advances in CGI these days, I don't know if this is computer generated or
> real. Which is it?
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 10:02 AM Frank Wimberly <wimberly3 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> For those who haven't seen the video that was mentioned in yesterday's
> meeting:
>
>
>
> https://youtu.be/fn3KWM1kuAw
>
>
>
> Marc has accomplished a lot since this:
>
>
>
>    - Raibert, M. H., Wimberly, F. C. 1984. Tabular control of balance in
>    a dynamic legged system. *IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics*
>     14:334--339.
>
>
>
> ---
> Frank C. Wimberly
> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
> Santa Fe, NM 87505
>
> 505 670-9918
> Santa Fe, NM
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
>
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
>
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam <http://bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe>
>
> un/subscribe <http://bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210403/afcf5df5/attachment.html>


More information about the Friam mailing list