[FRIAM] Natures_Queer_Performativity_the_authori.pdf
uǝlƃ ↙↙↙
gepropella at gmail.com
Thu Apr 29 18:27:09 EDT 2021
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306068036_Psychiatry_as_Bullshit
On 4/29/21 3:21 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
> Jon,
>
> I am sorry I disappointed you. My understanding of object relations theory is like swiss cheese and I chose not to provide an inadequate response by humming a few bars. By the way, object-relations theory provides a non-Oedipal alternative to your interpretation as explained by the Wikipedia article. I became the withholding bad object to you. I hope you will be able to integrate that with the good object I have been at times.
>
> Good for Glen.
>
> I am not a practitioner of psychoanalytic theory but it may not be for you. As for psychoanalytic /treatment, /see the last paragraph of the Wikipedia article.
>
> Warmly,
>
> Frank
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 4:09 PM jon zingale <jonzingale at gmail.com <mailto:jonzingale at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Frank,
>
> To some extent, your response is indicative of the psychoanalytic
> ends I criticize, the mommy-daddy-me Oedipal construction. Rather than
> pick up on the opportunity presented by the conversation to engage in an
> act of creativity (contributing to a forum), you use your agency to make
> an authoritative (daddy) appeal to an object away from yourself and your
> agency (the Wikipedia article). This action strikes me as functionally
> different than Glen's earlier reference, say. While Glen's appeal acts to
> ground and facilitate a living discussion, yours aims to end one. I felt
> that the question I asked was fair, to hum a few bars regarding a
> connection you are making that perhaps could contribute. If this sort of
> short-circuiting of concepts and conversation is what I can expect from
> practitioners of psychoanalytic theory, well, maybe it's not for me.
--
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ
More information about the Friam
mailing list