[FRIAM] Natures_Queer_Performativity_the_authori.pdf

[Frank Wimberly]

Sometime around twenty years ago I was approached by a company that was a
spinoff of Kaiser-Permanente.  They have access to decades of medical
records about millions of patients.  Their goal was to determine how much
of medical advice given to patients is evidence-based versus traditional
rule-based responses to patient symptoms and complaints.  Their preliminary
analysis was that about 25% was evidence-based.  I asked my primary care
provider what he thought and he wasn't surprised.

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, 4:52 PM Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com> wrote:

> By that definition most of medicine is bullshit.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ???
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 3:27 PM
> To: friam at redfish.com
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Natures_Queer_Performativity_the_authori.pdf
>
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306068036_Psychiatry_as_Bullshit
>
> On 4/29/21 3:21 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
> > Jon,
> >
> > I am sorry I disappointed you.  My understanding of object relations
> theory is like swiss cheese and I chose not to provide an inadequate
> response by humming a few bars.  By the way, object-relations theory
> provides a non-Oedipal alternative to your interpretation as explained by
> the Wikipedia article.  I became the withholding bad object to you.  I hope
> you will be able to integrate that with the good object I have been at
> times.
> >
> > Good for Glen.
> >
> > I am not a practitioner of psychoanalytic theory but it may not be for
> you.  As for psychoanalytic /treatment, /see the last paragraph of the
> Wikipedia article.
> >
> > Warmly,
> >
> > Frank
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 4:09 PM jon zingale <jonzingale at gmail.com
> <mailto:jonzingale at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Frank,
> >
> >     To some extent, your response is indicative of the psychoanalytic
> >     ends I criticize, the mommy-daddy-me Oedipal construction. Rather
> than
> >     pick up on the opportunity presented by the conversation to engage
> in an
> >     act of creativity (contributing to a forum), you use your agency to
> make
> >     an authoritative (daddy) appeal to an object away from yourself and
> your
> >     agency (the Wikipedia article). This action strikes me as
> functionally
> >     different than Glen's earlier reference, say. While Glen's appeal
> acts to
> >     ground and facilitate a living discussion, yours aims to end one. I
> felt
> >     that the question I asked was fair, to hum a few bars regarding a
> >     connection you are making that perhaps could contribute. If this
> sort of
> >     short-circuiting of concepts and conversation is what I can expect
> from
> >     practitioners of psychoanalytic theory, well, maybe it's not for me.
>
>
> --
> ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe
> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210429/9f4b7fcb/attachment.html>