[FRIAM] what complexity science says ...

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

Yep.  That’s what I was taught.  

 

N

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com> ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of Stephen Guerin
Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2021 2:12 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Cc: Boozer Daly <shizame at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] what complexity science says ...

 

 

 

 

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 11:46 AM <thompnickson2 at gmail.com <mailto:thompnickson2 at gmail.com> > wrote:

Forgive me.  As usual I overstated the case.  But the cochlea IS a piece of
meat, not a gang of oscillators.  In graduate school (back in the 19 

century) I was taught that one end of cochlea was following the wave while 

the other was using many neurons to follow the wave,    

 

eyebrowed monster which doth mock the meat,

resonant earbrows tune to your speech

 

Frequency Tuning
Each point along the basilar membrane oscillates a different amount, depending on the frequency of the sound. Points near the oval window, at the start, oscillate the largest amount in response to high-frequency tones. Points near the helicotrema oscillate by the largest amount in response to low-frequency tones.
from http://www.cns.nyu.edu/~david/courses/perception/lecturenotes/pitch/pitch.html






 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210207/9082d5ae/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 323023 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210207/9082d5ae/attachment-0001.png>