[FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid vaccinations

[uǝlƃ ☤>$]

But that's a bit of a weasel move. By using the phrase "Big Brother", which is overwhelmingly often used to refer to government(s), you implied the typical USA denotation of "censor", which is limited to government(s). Under the USA (and maybe other places), only Big Brother can censor. And Google is not Big Brother, even metaphorically, because their "Do no evil" mantra is compromised. So Google cannot censor.

But if you hadn't used "Big Brother", then your argument would be connotatively reasonable in the USA and denotatively reasonable in other jurisdictions.


On 6/18/21 8:26 AM, Pieter Steenekamp wrote:
> Agreed, Google is a company, not a government and I support that they should have the legal right to censor you. 
> 
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 17:00, Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com <mailto:marcus at snoutfarm.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Google is a company, not a government.____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     *From:* Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com <mailto:friam-bounces at redfish.com>> *On Behalf Of *Pieter Steenekamp
>     *Sent:* Friday, June 18, 2021 5:15 AM
>     *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com <mailto:friam at redfish.com>>
>     *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid vaccinations____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     Sorry people, the video I have referred to in the first post has been censored, so you can't see it. Big Brother has spoken.
>      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY> ____

-- 
☤>$ uǝlƃ