[FRIAM] Score one for Wokeism!

[Marcus Daniels]

Why is local flattening good?

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ???
Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 10:17 AM
To: friam at redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Score one for Wokeism!

Well, SDO seems like a fragile psychological theory to popularize ... like power-stancing or somesuch. But even if we buy its credible extrapolation into everyday life, my guess is it would be context sensitive. E.g. within some group of, say, neo-fascists, a mexican-hat structure might obtain, where all the nazis accept the authority of the 1 nazi, but work like hell to make nazis 2..N equal in status. Similarly, we might find a scaled organization like a traditional matrix organization where we have hierarchy in 2 dimensions. Etc.

So even if we adopt SDO as credible, diversity is good and homogeneity is bad. And *local* flattening is healthy.

On 3/5/21 10:11 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> I'm talking about personality.   I think the current polarization is a projection of SDO / non-SDO onto Republican / Democrat.   To what extent must injustice exist, or even be encouraged, to create a stable social system?

--
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/