[FRIAM] “Don’t they have grandchildren?” was The case for universal basic income UBI

Pieter Steenekamp pieters at randcontrols.co.za
Sat May 22 09:41:21 EDT 2021


Thank you DaveW, I support this!


On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 04:53, Prof David West <profwest at fastmail.fm> wrote:

>
>
> What started the problem (at least in the West)"
>
> *"Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our
> likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the
> birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the
> earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.”
> [Christian Bible]*
>
> Potential way out:
>
> *Those who have taken upon them to lay down the law of nature as a thing
> already searched out and understood, whether they have spoken in simple
> assurance or professional affectation, have therein done philosophy and the
> sciences great injury. For as they have been successful in inducing belief,
> so they have been effective in quenching and stopping inquiry; and have
> done more harm by spoiling and putting an end to other men's efforts than
> good by their own. Those on the other hand who have taken a contrary
> course, and asserted that absolutely nothing can be known — whether it were
> from hatred of the ancient sophists, or from uncertainty and fluctuation of
> mind, or even from a kind of fullness of learning, that they fell upon this
> opinion — have certainly advanced reasons for it that are not to be
> despised; but yet they have neither started from true principles nor rested
> in the just conclusion, zeal and affectation having carried them much too
> far... [Sir Francis Bacon]*
>
> *davew*
>
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2021, at 4:21 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
>
> Sorry.  I admire your memory.
>
> ---
> Frank C. Wimberly
> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
> Santa Fe, NM 87505
>
> 505 670-9918
> Santa Fe, NM
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2021, 3:11 PM uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Only about 100,000 times. >8^D The trick is whether or not you believe
> that sort of modeling is mechanistic or *merely* generative.
>
> On 5/21/21 2:08 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
> > Did I already post this here?
> >
> >
> >
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228446085_Simulation_validation_using_Causal_Inference_Theory_with_morphological_constraints#fullTextFileContent
> <
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228446085_Simulation_validation_using_Causal_Inference_Theory_with_morphological_constraints#fullTextFileContent
> >
> > ---
>
> --
> ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210522/7fb47b2b/attachment.html>


More information about the Friam mailing list