[FRIAM] Islam-Science-Muslims-and-Technology-Seyyed-Hossein-Nasr-in-Conversation-with-Muzaffar-Iqbal-2009.pdf

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

Great, Dave, 

 

What did you see there that had that effect?

n

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com> ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2021 4:33 PM
To: friam at redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Islam-Science-Muslims-and-Technology-Seyyed-Hossein-Nasr-in-Conversation-with-Muzaffar-Iqbal-2009.pdf

 

The biggest problem with western science since the enlightenment, is the myth that pure science is morally neutral — that the science, e.g., making an atomic bomb, is totally and absolutely separate from the dropping of said bomb on Hiroshima.

 

The best morning of my trip to Istanbul was the one spent in the Islamic Museum of Science and Technology. Wonderful exhibits. Strong antidote to the poison of modern scientism.

 

davew

 

 

On Sat, Sep 25, 2021, at 12:16 PM, thompnickson2 at gmail.com <mailto:thompnickson2 at gmail.com>  wrote:

Dear Colleagues, 

Because of an interest some of you expressed in Islamic science, I ran down the text linked below.  It is an entire book, and I have read only the first chapter, but I found that fascinating.  It is a sort of airing of linen concerning the role of science in the modern Islamic world that tracks in  interesting ways the recent American ambivalence about science.   This first chapter is both unsettling and very familiar at the same time. 

http://traditionalhikma.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Islam-Science-Muslims-and-Technology-Seyyed-Hossein-Nasr-in-Conversation-with-Muzaffar-Iqbal-2009.pdf

Ok, just to give you sense of one of the places it leaves me:  If the fault of western science is that it is laced with  unacknowledged western values, what would a science that acknowledged its values look like.  I have argued that the science we practice is absurdly dualistic (given that we have only one source of information).  But it is unclear to me how “dualism” is a value.  Is the “rape of nature” and all that follows implicit in dualism?  I wish I could claim that if I turn you all into monists, you will all become wind=turbine fanatics, but I don’t think that’s the case.   Do values guide what we do or are they just the heavy artillery that we muster to convince others to do what we have done? 

See what you think?

 

Nick

 

.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam <http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 

un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

archives:

5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/

1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210925/44ae823d/attachment-0001.html>