[FRIAM] AI Musings

[Stephen Guerin]

On Sat, Apr 1, 2023, 8:29 AM Roger Critchlow <rec at elf.org> wrote:

>
> I tried to get Bard to talk with me about the adjacent possible (AP) the
> other day.  It agreed that the AP could not be represented as a
> mathematical set, but it continued to talk about the AP as if it were a
> set.  So it suggested formulating the AP as a graph, or a tree, or as the
> states of a dynamical system.  I pushed for a non-set formalism and it gave
> me fuzzy sets.  I guess I have to try harder.
>

Roger, Cool. Can you say more about a different formalization you're after?

Stu's Theory Of The Adjacent Possible is currently formalized with an
exponentially increasing set

https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.14115#

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20230401/ee1edc05/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot_20230401_125024_Samsung Notes.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 545980 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20230401/ee1edc05/attachment-0001.jpg>