[FRIAM] KRACK

[gⅼеɳ ☣]

Ah!  I see. So, the idea is that even if the router-managed network is compromised, if we always rely on device-to-device encryption/conflation, then it doesn't matter if the network is compromised.  Hm.  I'm not convinced.  It seems like there should be meta-data and packet envelope data that would still be useful to the red team.  Plus, I have no idea how my roku or playstation, both of which provide access to my credit card, authenticate.  I'd like to think they use end-to-end encryption.  But ...  And then there are things like my DLNA server.  I'd like to think that I've done everything correctly and a black hat couldn't hack my server from my playstation.  But ...  And, of course, I've configured Renee's Windows 10 machine so that it doesn't use the firewall while on the home network.  I suppose I should change that, too.  [sigh]

If it weren't for that serial-killer-style van with the fake looking logo on the side, parked outside my house every month or so, I wouldn't worry so much. 8^)

On 10/20/2017 04:11 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Add extra (vpn/tor) encryption where it matters [by using this device].

-- 
☣ gⅼеɳ