[FRIAM] description - explanation - metaphor - model - and reply
Frank Wimberly
wimberly3 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 16 07:54:48 EST 2020
👍
-----------------------------------
Frank Wimberly
Phone (505) 670-9918
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 1:39 AM Prof David West <profwest at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Nick,
>
> Not sophmoric smarminess - but a contradiction of your monism. "you are a
> model" contradicts "my model of you" which asserts "representation" of
> something — Cartesian dualism.
>
> davew
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, at 9:44 PM, thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:
>
> Eric,
>
>
>
> I apologize forwhat may seem sophomoric smarminess but…..
>
>
>
> To me, you are a model, right? Whatever you are, it is my model of you
> with which I am dealing. So, when you intend something by a model, it is
> a case of a model intending a model, right? So, models intend, right? So
> why not just say so, in the first instance.
>
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> Nicholas Thompson
>
> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
>
> Clark University
>
> ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com
>
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Eric Charles
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2020 1:27 PM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam at redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] description - explanation - metaphor - model - and
> reply
>
>
>
> There is an interesting issue that often comes up in these contexts, in
> which someone asserts that the models mean something all on their own. If
> it is someone who has picked up our language, they might, for example,
> ask "What does the model intend? The Model, itself? "
>
>
>
> Glen does this by saying "there's good reason to believe you will *never*
> actually understand how your model works."
>
>
>
> I have seen Nick oscillate in those discussions, towards and away from
> thinking he needs to rewrite everything.
>
>
>
> I insist that is not the direction should be going in. The model doesn't
> intend anything. A person, who is offering a model, intends something by
> it, and does not intend other things. Because THAT is what we'r are
> talking about.... There IS a chance (though no guarentee) that the person
> offering a model (fully) understands what they do or do not intend to match
> between the model and the situation that is modeled.
>
>
>
> We aren't talking about anything other than people doing things. X is "a
> model" if/when someone thinks an aspect of X matches something happening
> somewhere else, and all models contain both intended and unintended
> implications. This makes a question of whether or not someone "fully
> understands their model" a question primarily about the understanding, not
> primarily about "the model itself".
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 1:13 PM uǝlƃ ☣ <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Did Epstein ever respond to your criticism?
>
> For what little it's worth, I disagree with your lesson. Obtuse models can
> be very useful. In fact, there's good reason to believe you will *never*
> actually understand how your model works, any more than you'll ever
> understand how that model's referent(s) work. I may even be able to use
> Pierce to argue that to you. 8^)
>
> On 1/15/20 9:23 AM, thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:
> > The lesson is, if you
> > don’t understand how your model works, you aren’t doing yourself any
> favors by inventing it. This led to my war with Epstein in the pages of
> JSSS about the relation between explanation and prediction.
>
> --
> ☣ uǝlƃ
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20200116/45cc3200/attachment.html>
More information about the Friam
mailing list