[FRIAM] alternative response

[Steve Smith]

On 6/14/20 6:34 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>
> Sure, ok.   I don’t know what any of this has to do with Russ’ lecture
> on free will.
>
> I was just responding in the affirmative to the apparently underlying
> question of if we are all reactive machines.  Of course we are.  While
> the reaction could be complicated, or the stimulus could be
> communicated over a faulty channel and thus result in a response that
> is inappropriate, how **could** it be any other way?    I didn’t say
> anything about the taxonomy of machines being limited or any
> individual instance being simplistic.  That’s just a straw man.
>
... and I was just... being "reactive"?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20200614/3da93e82/attachment.html>