[FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid vaccinations

[uǝlƃ ☤>$]

OK. Thanks. So, the mRNA vaccine components *might* travel farther and wider than the traditional vaccines. This is what the Japanese study says. But it studied the LIPID NANOPARTICLES, not the spike protein or the mRNA that codes for the spike protein. There's no evidence the *dangerous* part of it, the spike protein, travels so far. And, as far as I can tell, there's no evidence that the traditional vaccines show the same traveling. They are all COVID19 vaccines, the mRNA ones and the traditional ones. So, it's vague to say "Covid vaccine acts", too vague.

Do you know of evidence showing that the non-mRNA Covid vaccines behave the same way as the mRNA vaccines?

The Gorski article debunks the misinformation surrounding the Japanese study.

On 6/18/21 2:03 PM, Pieter Steenekamp wrote:
> dr Robert Malone explains how the Covid vaccine acts totally different than expected and different than all other vaccines. When a person gets vaccinated with other vaccines, there is a little bit of invection in the upper arm and the immune system kicks in, with "all the action" taking place in the area of the upper arm. On the other hand, with the Covid vaccine the vaccine particles, very unexpectedly, travels through the who;e body and "the action" is not limited to the upper arm area. Specifically a large concentration happens in the ovaries and that scares him very much.

-- 
☤>$ uǝlƃ